SLEEPING PILL HEALTH INSURANCE REMOVAL ?
COPYRIGHT STICHTING THE UNICORN FONDATION © 23 JANUARY 2008

Usually we would consider the bipolarity principle (and reality of impossible odds) when evaluating complex issues if this does not conflict with our statutory tasks (e.g. prevention of malignant reinforcement {de-facto} genocide ) .

Regarding the Sleeping Pill health insurance removal this could become an issue.

In many countries (e.g in Holland etc.) people depend on Sleeping Pills 650.000 people depend on Sleeping Pills (+/- 5% of the population).

It may be argued that there may be a reason for this.

Doctors may have a reason for prescribing them , as with other prescription drugs . Just removing them from the health insurance because it would mean an annual saving of say 100.000.000 Euro for the Insurance Companies could be the beginning of ending the entire health insurance system . Is that really what we want ?

If this policy would be combined with other (certainly highly defendable but very complex) measures such as stern control of smoking (including earlier tolerated {e.g. soft-drug} modes, would we not be creating vicious circles of negative dynamic interaction ?

We could elaborate on the above depending on imputes we may receive . Considering the seriousness of the situation we may have to restrict elaborations to communications with specialist entities.
(For this reason not all links have been connected yet).

Hoping to serve you all,
unicornvortex, jpk

Note added 23012008 0808cet.

Just before publication we received imputes indicating that in the text above we may not have put sufficient emphasis on the opposite in concurrence with the bipolarity principle.
We fully agree with this .
Let it be known then that, if anything , the full bipolarity- mode still holds . . .
We have no indications whatsoever to assume the balance has changed !
There now. . .
We could elaborate on the above depending on imputes we may receive . Considering the seriousness of the situation we may have to restrict elaborations to communications with specialist entities.
(For this reason not all links have been connected yet).

Hoping to serve you all,
unicornvortex, jpk&jas

Page 2 of 3 .

Note added 280108 1640cet .

ELABORATING ON THE NOTE (added 230108 0808cet.) DIRECTLY ABOVE .

With the bipolarity principle we may refer to our position that nearly everything has at least two sides .
Please activate the links
globalmind bi-polarity principle and globalmind reality of impossible odds
for explanation .

We now have significant and serious imputes indicating that it may be possible to completely terminate fairly consistent (considerable) use of sleeping pills (e.g. to ensure recuperation sleep) , from one day to another .

(For obvious reasons this text was written in DESADC-mode) .

We could elaborate on the above depending on imputes we may receive . Considering the seriousness of the situation we may have to restrict elaborations to communications with specialist entities.
(For this reason not all links have been connected yet) .

Hoping to serve you all,
unicornvortex, jas&jpk .

 

Page 3 of 3 .

Note added 06 February 2008.

After our previous note we have done some complex research in the field of ending sleeping pill dependence .
Our imputes have made it clear that sleeping pill dependence and other dependencies in a comparable context (e.g. colonoscopies) may be a mayor global problem affecting millions and millions of humans the world over .
We have considerable research experience in the relevant fields and we are now proceeding with some of it under PRELIMINARY REFERENCES .

Our own position in very general terms :
Mind influencing substances should always be approach with great caution , especially when they may be habit or dependence forming or addicting .
When there is no obvious need they should be avoided at all times .
When they are needed specialist knowledge concerning the amounts involved and relevant withdrawal procedures is required in applicable overrule-mode .
To base decisions on political and/or financial aspects only could lead to a policy which should be described as crime against humanity
.

PRELIMINARY REFERENCES .
Some Links and Link Clusters (When you are on Internet the links are automatically clickable) :
Google all the word  : Sleep doctors are in
Google exact phrase : The (sleep) doctor is in
Google all the words : The (sleep) doctor is in
http://research.ua.edu/archive2005/sleep.html
Globalmind use of drugs
GLOBAL USE OF DRUGS
YAHOO! NEWS Docs (etc) on colonoscopies

 

Note added 17 June 2008
under (scientific research) construction

SUMMARIZING SOME MAJOR POINTS :
It can not be denied that "downers" like sleeping pills can be a blessing
just as "uppers" (e.g. coffee) can save lives (see P.S. ...) .
Considering the negative aspects and recent imputes we are
however suggesting the following points .
1. REGARD uppers and downers AS ADDICTING DRUGS .
2. USE ONLY WHEN TOP PERFORMANCE IS REQUIRED
(e.g. IN LIFE THREATENING SITUATIONS , such as (defacto) war zones) .
3. ALWAYS AVOID USAGE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS .
4. " UPPERS " AND "DOWNERS " MAY BE STRONGLY RELATED :
(You may need an upper to get up and a downer to fall asleep again).
.
5. STOP USAGE COMPLETELY WHEN THE THREATENING CONDITION HAS PASSED .

ELABORATING ON POINTS 1-5 .
REGARDING POINT :
1. See PS please.
2. LIFE THREATENING SITUATIONS COULD ALSO BE VERY IMPORTANT EXAMS
THAT WOULD DETERMINE YOUR FUTURE .
3. IF AT ALL POSSIBLE , STOP USAGE EVERY OTHER DAY .
4. Sometimes "uppers" are taken (more or less directly ) after morning wake-up .
This may be unavoidable but remember :
you are "compensating" one addicting "drug" with another .
Please note :
Uppers may also come in an (unintentionally) disguised form .
A cup of coffee is basically an upper .
One "normal" cup of coffee would be a normal upper to start the day .
3 to 4 cups a day would probably be a normal amount for many people .
Providing the amount of caffeine in one cup is not excessive .
When "instant" coffee is used this could become different .
If the manufacturer suggests 1 teaspoon for one cup
and you use 2, you have doubled the amount ! (6 to 8 cups a day).
If you use just an ordinary spoon , 2 spoons could be 12 teaspoons !
You would be taking 12 cups a day (etc.) .
How many ‘REAL CUPS" would you be drinking if you drank 4 cups with 3 ordinary spoons per cup ?
VERIFY AND MAKE TABLE!
5. Stop usage completely when the threatening situation has passed (e.g. After the exam(s) .
P.S.
It took us less then a minute with google to establish a predicted (verifiable) probable relation between
caffeine import in Europe and the beginning of the first industrial Revolution .
The first coffee, around 450 kg , from Java , was exported to Europe in 1711 . . . Ten years
later the export had grown to 60.000 kg . ...
By the 1750`s the First Industrial Revolution had begun . ...
Choice between impossible odds . . .?

Related globalmind links :
Mind and Global Brain___        GLOBAL USE OF DRUGS       TOTAL INDEX GLOBALMIND       LATEST UPDATES     
HIGH LIGHTS UPDATES PREVIOUS MONTHS      EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION CRISIS      EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION CRISIS
____Beschrijving van de wereld geest en de wereld hersenen______      Planetair gebruik van drugs       Europese grondwet crisis in wereld perspectief

We may elaborate on the above depending on imputes we receive ,
Sorry to be such a bore . . .
Unicornvortex, jas&jpk

DISCLAIMER